Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 131 • VG SZ III 2018 131 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Prior Ruling Regarding Legal Interpretation (2018)

Numero d'incarto III 2018 131
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a lower court's decision, which had likely involved a dispute between the petitioner and a respondent following a prior ruling, regarding the interpretation or application of a legal matter, but the core dispute and the specific legal basis for the challenge are not fully detailed in the provided excerpt; the court reached a decision on November 28, 2018, composed of a Vice President and two Judges, alongside a deputy court clerk.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Prior Ruling Regarding Legal Interpretation (2018): A petitioner challenged a lower court's decision, which had likely involved a dispute between the petitioner and a respondent following a prior ruling, regarding the interpretation or application of a legal matter, but the core dispute and the specific legal basis for the challenge are not fully detailed in the provided excerpt; the court reached a decision on November 28, 2018, composed of a Vice President and two Judges, alongside a deputy court clerk.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sentenze interpretative oggetto della lite mutamento di giurisprudenza accertamento giudiziale di diritti nuove allegazioni di diritto diritto alla risoluzione del contratto
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2022 43
Appeal of Revision Denial
I 2022 34
Appeal Decision of November 10, 2022
BEK 2019 12
Appeal Timeliness Challenge Against December 31, 2018 Ruling
I 2024 58
Appeal of [Party A] v. [Party B]
BEK 2019 69
Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Opening and Claim Enforcement

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 131 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________, , \n Vorinstanz, \n2. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n