Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 127 • VG SZ III 2018 127 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2018 127
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging a building permit granted by the municipal council, which was upheld by the cantonal government and the cantonal planning office, for a construction project. The appellants, a group of neighbors, contested the approval, arguing against the project's compliance with planning and building regulations. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal because the appellants failed to demonstrate that the contested planning decision and subsequent building permit violated any protected legal rights or that the lower authorities erred in their assessment of the applicable planning and building law concerning the project's details.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed: The appellants, a group of neighbors, contested the approval, arguing against the project's compliance with planning and building regulations. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal because the appellants failed to demonstrate that the contested planning decision and subsequent building permit violated any protected legal rights or that the lower authorities erred in their assessment of the applicable planning and building law concerning the project's details.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza di costruzione deroga alla licenza edilizia diritto di manifestare divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico ritiro dell'autorizzazione proprietà fondiaria Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 127 + 128 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, O.________, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2018 127), Ziff. 1-6 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. G.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. H.________, \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n \n \n1. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. I.________ AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. J.________,J.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: