Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 120 • VG SZ III 2018 120 Generato dall'IA

Zoning Compliance and Building Permit Denial

Numero d'incarto III 2018 120
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a decision regarding a building permit that was partially denied by the lower administrative body and subsequently upheld by the cantonal government authority. The court reasoned that the administrative body's decision to deny the permit for an addition to a structure was justified because the proposed construction did not comply with the local zoning regulations concerning the building's permissible placement and setbacks relative to property boundaries, thereby violating public law requirements for construction authorization.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Zoning Compliance and Building Permit Denial: The court reasoned that the administrative body's decision to deny the permit for an addition to a structure was justified because the proposed construction did not comply with the local zoning regulations concerning the building's permissible placement and setbacks relative to property boundaries, thereby violating public law requirements for construction authorization.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla zona licenza edilizia distanze dal confine edificio pubblico superamento dell'altezza massima zona edificabile
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 8
Building Permit Denial Compliance with Zoning Regulations
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2019 38
Municipal Building Permit Denial Upheld on Zoning Violation Grounds
III 2024 3
Challenge to Building Permit Zoning Compliance
III 2019 87
Local Authority Zoning Compliance Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 120 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n