Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 116 • VG SZ III 2018 116 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Appointment of Child Representative

Numero d'incarto III 2018 116
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority that appointed a representative for two children. The appellants, presumably the children's parents, contested the appointment of the representative who was acting on behalf of the children. The court upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the appointment of a representative for the children was necessary to ensure their right to be heard and to protect their interests in the ongoing proceedings, thereby affirming the lower authority's proper exercise of discretion in safeguarding the minors' procedural rights.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Vertretung von fremdplatzierten Minderjährigen / KESB-Beschluss IIA/002/20/2018 vom 23.5.2018) | Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nomina del rappresentante procedura di protezione dei minori diritti del bambino autorità di protezione degli adulti diritto di essere sentito figli minorenni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court decided on the apportionment of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 87
Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2019 86
Appeal Against Representation Guardianship Establishment
III 2017 210
Child Protection Placement Appeal Remanded for Clarification
III 2020 80
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Placement Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court decided on the apportionment of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 116 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 3. Oktober 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n beide gemäss den Beschlüssen der KESB E.________ vom 5. Februar 2018 (Nr. IIA/001/04-1/2018 und IIA/002/04-1/2018) vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. C.________, \n \n1. D.________, \n für A.________ und B.________ als Beschwerde führender Vertreter der Kinder auftretend, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) E.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. F.________, \n Beigeladene, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. G.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n