Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2018 115 • VG SZ III 2018 115 Generato dall'IA

Landfill Remediation Cost Allocation Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2018 115
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a decision concerning the allocation of remediation costs and fees related to a landfill site. The initial administrative bodies and subsequent cantonal governmental council upheld the cost distribution plan, which the company challenged. The court reasoned that the cost allocation method, which considered the extent of benefit derived from the remediation measures by the various responsible parties, was based on a legally sound assessment of the circumstances and thus upheld the lower authorities' decision regarding the distribution of the remediation expenses.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Landfill Remediation Cost Allocation Appeal: The initial administrative bodies and subsequent cantonal governmental council upheld the cost distribution plan, which the company challenged. The court reasoned that the cost allocation method, which considered the extent of benefit derived from the remediation measures by the various responsible parties, was based on a legally sound assessment of the circumstances and thus upheld the lower authorities' decision regarding the distribution of the remediation expenses.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ripartizione delle spese tassa sui rifiuti gestione dei rifiuti spese amministrative decisione motivata recupero dei costi
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2023 34
Property Owners' Appeal on Landfill Logging Consent Cost Assessment
II 2022 62
Company v. Municipal Council on Sewage Connection Fees
II 2025 16
Holding Company Waste Fee Upheld
III 2022 117
Landfill Extension Appeal Remanded for Clarification on Stability and School Safety
III 2018 233
Appeal Concerning Gravel Pit Restoration Deadlines and Objection Cost Allocation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 115 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Umweltschutz, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2162, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. C.________, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat, C.________, 6415 Arth, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. E.________,E.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt F.________F.________, \n3. G.________, bestehend aus: \n - H.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Umweltschutzrecht (Sanierung einer Deponie: Kostenverteilung / Gebühren) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: