Scholarship Appeal Decision Upheld
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding a scholarship, where the appellant challenged a prior ruling by two lower administrative bodies. The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented, upheld the lower decisions, likely determining that the appellant did not meet the necessary criteria or legal requirements for receiving the scholarship as determined by the relevant cantonal educational authority and the government council.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Scholarship Appeal Decision Upheld: The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented, upheld the lower decisions, likely determining that the appellant did not meet the necessary criteria or legal requirements for receiving the scholarship as determined by the relevant cantonal educational authority and the government council.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the court costs.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 104 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Berufsbildung, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2193, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Stipendium |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: