Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority concerning a guardianship matter. The appellant challenged the authority's ruling, which presumably related to the care or protection of an individual. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual findings and legal basis of the authority's decision, ultimately deciding whether the challenged measure was in the best interest of the protected person and complied with relevant statutes governing guardianship and protection.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision: The appellant challenged the authority's ruling, which presumably related to the care or protection of an individual. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual findings and legal basis of the authority's decision, ultimately deciding whether the challenged measure was in the best interest of the protected person and complied with relevant statutes governing guardianship and protection.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 101 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, \n B.________, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) F.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n