Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2018 101 • VG SZ III 2018 101 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2018 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority concerning a guardianship matter. The appellant challenged the authority's ruling, which presumably related to the care or protection of an individual. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual findings and legal basis of the authority's decision, ultimately deciding whether the challenged measure was in the best interest of the protected person and complied with relevant statutes governing guardianship and protection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision: The appellant challenged the authority's ruling, which presumably related to the care or protection of an individual. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual findings and legal basis of the authority's decision, ultimately deciding whether the challenged measure was in the best interest of the protected person and complied with relevant statutes governing guardianship and protection.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità tutoria riesame della curatela messa in pericolo del bene del figlio procedura di gratuito patrocinio base fattuale diritto di visita
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 101 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, \n B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) F.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n