Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 68 • VG SZ III 2017 68 Generato dall'IA

Property Owners v. Cantonal Authorities on Zoning Compliance

Numero d'incarto III 2017 68
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of property owners appealed decisions by local and cantonal authorities that approved a commercial development, arguing the project violated zoning regulations concerning building volume, density, and public law provisions related to proximity and use restrictions. The court dismissed the appeals, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted and applied the relevant municipal land use plan and building regulations, finding no demonstrable error in the assessment of whether the proposed construction exceeded the permissible limits for volume, density, or infringed upon protected neighborhood interests or legal restrictions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Property Owners v. Cantonal Authorities on Zoning Compliance: The court dismissed the appeals, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted and applied the relevant municipal land use plan and building regulations, finding no demonstrable error in the assessment of whether the proposed construction exceeded the permissible limits for volume, density, or infringed upon protected neighborhood interests or legal restrictions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla zona diritto fondiario terreno comunale incentivazione immobiliare autorità amministrativa piano di costruzione
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 97
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authorities Regarding Building Permit Conditions
III 2021 50
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authority (Building Permit Denial)
III 2019 71
Zoning Appeal Regarding Building Height and Setback Compliance
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2018 227
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 68 III 2017 70 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. September 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. Ba, _______, \n4. F.________, \n5. G.________ \n6. H.________, \n7. I.________, \n8. J.________, \n9. K.________, \n10. L.________, , \n11. M.________, \n12. H.________, \n13. O.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2017 68) und Beigeladene (Verfahren III 2017 70), alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Franz Schuler, \n Gutenbergweg 5, Postfach 32, 6410 Goldau, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Steinen, Postplatz 8, 6422 Steinen, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2017 68 + 70), \n4. Q-Arena GmbH, Rossbergstrasse 33, 6422 Steinen, \n Beschwerdegegnerin (Verfahren III 2017 68 + 70), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Felix Barmettler, \n Bahnhofstrasse 8, 6403 Küssnacht, \n5. AD.________, \n6. AE.________, , \n7. P.________, \n8. Q.________, \n Beigeladene (Verfahren III 2017 68 + 70) |\n

\n\n

\n