Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 60 • VG SZ III 2017 60 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Conversion of Agricultural Building to Commercial Center

Numero d'incarto III 2017 60
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision by a local administrative body concerning the expansion of a commercial facility, where the appellant sought approval to convert an existing agricultural building into a commercial business center, which required a zoning change and faced objections related to the impact on neighboring agricultural land and local planning regulations. The court reasoned that the lower administrative bodies correctly determined that the proposed commercial use was incompatible with the designated agricultural zone because the project significantly exceeded the scope typical for a secondary use within such a zone and lacked sufficient justification to warrant a deviation from the established land-use plan, thus upholding the rejection of the expansion plans.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Conversion of Agricultural Building to Commercial Center: The court reasoned that the lower administrative bodies correctly determined that the proposed commercial use was incompatible with the designated agricultural zone because the project significantly exceeded the scope typical for a secondary use within such a zone and lacked sufficient justification to warrant a deviation from the established land-use plan, thus upholding the rejection of the expansion plans.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
utilizzazione agricola zona commerciale utilizzazione del fondo piano di costruzione cambiamento di destinazione norme per l'edilizia
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 181
Appeal Against Denial of Agricultural Building Conversion to Residential Unit
III 2019 29
Zoning Challenge to Agricultural Building Conversion Rejection Upheld
III 2018 63
Unauthorized Conversion and Exceeding Non-Conforming Use Permit for Agricultural Building
III 2018 205
Agricultural Land Conversion Appeal Decision Upheld
III 2016 134
Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 60 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Oliver Bucher, \n Oberstadtstrasse 7, Postfach 2060, 5402 Baden, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. J.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n