Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 234 • VG SZ III 2017 234 Generato dall'IA

Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2017 234
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision by the cantonal government and administrative bodies concerning planning law, arguing that a decision on land use designation was flawed. The court reasoned that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant lacked the requisite standing, as the contested decision did not directly affect their rights or legitimate interests in a way that warranted judicial review under the relevant procedural law, thus affirming the lower instances' rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed: The court reasoned that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant lacked the requisite standing, as the contested decision did not directly affect their rights or legitimate interests in a way that warranted judicial review under the relevant procedural law, thus affirming the lower instances' rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a ricorrere diritto fondiario legittimazione a contestare licenza sindacato giurisdizionale diritti procedurali approvazione dei piani
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 217
Spatial Planning Dispute Appeal Dismissed
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2018 170
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2024 104
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing to Challenge Development Plan
III 2020 34
Municipality Planning Appeal Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 234 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat H.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n