Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 226 • VG SZ III 2017 226 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2017 226
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a building permit decision concerning a property development project, with the appellant challenging the rulings of the local council, the cantonal development office, and the cantonal government. The court reasoned that the appeal should be dismissed because the planning and building law requirements, including those related to zoning and essential public interests, were met, thereby affirming the legitimacy of the contested permit decisions made by the lower authorities.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed: The court reasoned that the appeal should be dismissed because the planning and building law requirements, including those related to zoning and essential public interests, were met, thereby affirming the legitimacy of the contested permit decisions made by the lower authorities.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obbligo del permesso di costruzione incentivazione immobiliare edificio pubblico poteri pubblici proprietà pubblica divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 170
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 127
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 226 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Ziff. 1-3), |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: