Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 221 • VG SZ III 2017 221 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Replacement of Mandated Representative by KESB

Numero d'incarto III 2017 221
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal challenged a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) dated September 13, 2017, concerning the replacement of an appointed representative (mandatsträgerin). The court reasoned that the prior representative's request for substitution, based on the claim that she could no longer fulfill the mandate due to a strained relationship with the protected person, provided sufficient objective grounds to justify the authority's decision to appoint a new representative, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Replacement of Mandated Representative by KESB: The court reasoned that the prior representative's request for substitution, based on the claim that she could no longer fulfill the mandate due to a strained relationship with the protected person, provided sufficient objective grounds to justify the authority's decision to appoint a new representative, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
messa in pericolo del bene del figlio autorità con potere di nomina autorità di protezione degli adulti sostituzione dei motivi motivi protetti rappresentante autorizzato
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 173
KESB Mandate Holder Replacement Appeal Dismissed
III 2022 87
Appeal Against Change of Mandated Representative by Child and Adult Protection Authority
III 2019 136
Appeal Against Termination of Representative Guardianship
III 2021 114
Appeal Regarding Change of Mandated Representative in Protection Measures
III 2019 194
KESB Residence Revocation Appeal on Child Custody and Guardianship

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 221 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n ZGB (KESB-Beschluss vom 13.9.2017 betr. Wechsel einer Mandatsträgerin) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: