Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 217 • VG SZ III 2017 217 Generato dall'IA

Foreign National Residence Permit Appeal Based on Short-Term Marriage

Numero d'incarto III 2017 217
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant, a foreign national, appealed a decision regarding a residence permit, with the lower courts upholding the refusal of the permit. The court reasoned that although the applicant was married to a citizen, the marriage had only lasted a short time, and the duration of cohabitation was insufficient to establish a genuine marital life within the scope of the relevant foreign law provisions, thus justifying the rejection of the residence permit based on family reunification grounds.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Foreign National Residence Permit Appeal Based on Short-Term Marriage: The court reasoned that although the applicant was married to a citizen, the marriage had only lasted a short time, and the duration of cohabitation was insufficient to establish a genuine marital life within the scope of the relevant foreign law provisions, thus justifying the rejection of the residence permit based on family reunification grounds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
matrimonio di breve durata permesso di famiglia cittadini stranieri matrimonio misto permesso di soggiorno di breve durata decisione straniera Ausländerrecht (Aufenthaltsbewilligung) | Ausländerrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 45
Residence Permit Revocation After Short Marriage Separation
III 2018 76
Residence Status Appeal After Divorce
III 2022 188
Residence Permit Revocation Following Separation Upheld
III 2020 10
Residence Permit Revocation Upheld Despite Post-Marital Hardship Claim
III 2020 162
Appeal of Residency Permit Refusal Based on Insufficient Financial Means for Family Reunification

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 217 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. März 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Alois ab Yberg, \n Bahnhofstrasse 4, Postfach 762, 6431 Schwyz, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ausländerrecht (Aufenthaltsbewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: