Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 213 • VG SZ III 2017 213 Generato dall'IA

Senior Care Center v. Child and Adult Protection Authority Regarding Ward's Discretionary Funds

Numero d'incarto III 2017 213
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A senior care center sought judicial review against a child and adult protection authority's decision concerning a ward's discretionary funds, specifically challenging the amount deemed available for the ward's personal use. The court reasoned that the authority correctly applied relevant provisions of the Civil Code when determining the portion of the ward's assets that the representative could dispose of freely, finding the initial determination to be within the legally permissible parameters and not constituting an overreach or misuse of discretion regarding the ward's financial autonomy and needs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Senior Care Center v. Child and Adult Protection Authority Regarding Ward's Discretionary Funds: The court reasoned that the authority correctly applied relevant provisions of the Civil Code when determining the portion of the ward's assets that the representative could dispose of freely, finding the initial determination to be within the legally permissible parameters and not constituting an overreach or misuse of discretion regarding the ward's financial autonomy and needs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti potere d'apprezzamento del giudice messa in pericolo del bene del figlio autonomia finanziaria disposizioni finanziarie assistenza agli anziani

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is rejected, and costs are imposed on the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2018 209
Appeal Regarding Adult Protective Measure and Alternative Care Arrangement
III 2017 2
Care Recipients' Appeal on Social Assistance and Legal Fees Upheld in Part
III 2020 48
Judicial Review of Child and Adult Protection Authority's Approval of Report and Accounts
III 2020 50
Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is rejected, and costs are imposed on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 213 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Seniorenzentrum Engelhof, Engelhofstrasse 1, 8852 Altendorf, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n ZGB (Vertretungsbeistandschaft/ Betrag zur freien Verfügung nach