Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 199 • VG SZ III 2017 199 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Demolition and Expansion in Open Space Zone

Numero d'incarto III 2017 199
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against the rejection of a request for building permission concerning the demolition of an existing structure and the construction of a new, larger building on a property located in an area designated for open space and recreation, where the existing structure was legally non-conforming due to its location within this designated zone. The court upheld the lower instances' decision to deny the permit, reasoning that the proposed project constituted a significant expansion that contravened the established land use plan, which mandates that such areas remain predominantly open and that structural development, especially enlargement, is generally prohibited absent specific, exceptional planning justifications that were not met in this instance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Demolition and Expansion in Open Space Zone: The court upheld the lower instances' decision to deny the permit, reasoning that the proposed project constituted a significant expansion that contravened the established land use plan, which mandates that such areas remain predominantly open and that structural development, especially enlargement, is generally prohibited absent specific, exceptional planning justifications that were not met in this instance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
permesso di demolizione zona edificabile incentivazione immobiliare legittimazione a contestare licenza approvazione dei piani piano direttore Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 110
Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations
III 2018 151
Appeal Against Building Permit for Mixed-Use Reconstruction in Core Zone
III 2018 211
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Rejection Based on Land Use Regulations
III 2017 140
Appeal of Denial of Construction Permits Based on Landscape Integration and Building Volume
III 2020 192
Appeal Against Refusal of Building Permit and Demolition Order for Unauthorized Gabion Walls

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 199 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt M.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt N.________,, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n