Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2017 176 • VG SZ III 2017 176 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Expropriation Compensation Valuation

Numero d'incarto III 2017 176
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Cantonal Valuation Commission for Expropriations regarding a public works project that required the compulsory acquisition of property. The appellants challenged the valuation of the expropriated land and the calculation of compensation. The court reasoned that the initial valuation was based on established legal standards for determining market value at the time of the taking, correctly considering comparable sales and necessary adjustments for factors such as the specific zoning and developmental potential of the property, thereby upholding the Commission's determination of fair compensation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Expropriation Compensation Valuation: The appellants challenged the valuation of the expropriated land and the calculation of compensation. The court reasoned that the initial valuation was based on established legal standards for determining market value at the time of the taking, correctly considering comparable sales and necessary adjustments for factors such as the specific zoning and developmental potential of the property, thereby upholding the Commission's determination of fair compensation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità d'espropriazione valore venale dell'immobile rettifica del valore proprietà pubblica lavori pubblici determinazione del valore litigioso Enteignungsrecht (materielle Enteignung / Entschädigung) | Enteignungsrecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 176 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. August 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kantonale Schätzungskommission für Enteignungen, \n c/o RA lic.iur. Jolanda Fleischli, Seidenstrasse 2, Postfach, 8853 Lachen, \n Vorinstanz, \n |\n

\n\n

\n