Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 175 • VG SZ III 2017 175 Generato dall'IA

Petitioner Standing in Zoning Dispute

Numero d'incarto III 2017 175
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two petitioners challenged a cantonal government decision that dismissed their appeals against a municipal council resolution concerning the development of a property, specifically regarding the approval of development plans and building permits that they argued violated planning and building regulations. The court reasoned that the petitioners lacked the necessary legal standing to challenge the resolution because the decision did not directly affect their legally protected interests, as their arguments pertained only to general concerns about adherence to planning law which was not sufficient to establish a personal grievance justifying their intervention in the administrative process.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Petitioner Standing in Zoning Dispute: The court reasoned that the petitioners lacked the necessary legal standing to challenge the resolution because the decision did not directly affect their legally protected interests, as their arguments pertained only to general concerns about adherence to planning law which was not sufficient to establish a personal grievance justifying their intervention in the administrative process.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a contestare licenza prescrizioni di zona difetto di legittimazione impugnazione di decisioni amministrative proprietà immobiliare licenza edilizia comunale
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 195
Zoning Dispute Over Building Permit Approval
III 2021 198
Petitioner v. Cantonal Governmental Council (Zoning Permit)
III 2019 109
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2017 233
Municipal Planning Appeal Standing Challenge

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 175 III 2017 178 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2017 175), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, \n2. B.________ \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2017 178), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2017 175 und 178), |\n

\n\n

\n