Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 171 • VG SZ III 2017 171 Generato dall'IA

Jurisdictional Review of Child Protection Authority Based on Habitual Residence

Numero d'incarto III 2017 171
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A child and adult protective authority initiated a review of the jurisdiction of another such authority concerning a specific case, challenging the territorial competence previously established. The court reasoned that jurisdiction is determined by the habitual residence of the person concerned at the time the protective measure is requested or initiated, and since the subject had established a new, long-term residence in the jurisdiction of the challenged authority, that authority was indeed the competent body, thereby dismissing the appeal regarding the jurisdictional determination.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Jurisdictional Review of Child Protection Authority Based on Habitual Residence: The court reasoned that jurisdiction is determined by the habitual residence of the person concerned at the time the protective measure is requested or initiated, and since the subject had established a new, long-term residence in the jurisdiction of the challenged authority, that authority was indeed the competent body, thereby dismissing the appeal regarding the jurisdictional determination.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
residenza abituale del minore riesame della curatela determinazione del foro competente messa in pericolo del bene del figlio organi di ricorso diritto di visita sorvegliato
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 27
Parent v. Child and Adult Protection Authority on Jurisdiction
III 2020 149
Welfare Authority v. Child and Adult Protection Authority: Jurisdictional Dispute in Child Protection
III 2017 210
Child Protection Placement Appeal Remanded for Clarification
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld
III 2020 80
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Placement Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 171 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) A.________ (SZ), \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n und |\n \n|\n |\n KESB B.________ (SG), \n Beigeladene, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n ZGB (Prüfung der Zuständigkeit nach