Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 161 • VG SZ III 2017 161 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility

Numero d'incarto III 2017 161
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant challenged a decision by the municipal council regarding building permit regulations, which was upheld by the cantonal government and the regional planning authority. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the applicant, despite owning adjacent property, failed to demonstrate a direct, current, and legally protected interest in the annulment of the zoning decision, as the decision did not directly affect their personal legal sphere.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the applicant, despite owning adjacent property, failed to demonstrate a direct, current, and legally protected interest in the annulment of the zoning decision, as the decision did not directly affect their personal legal sphere.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale prescrizioni di zona legittimazione a contestare licenza proprietà immobiliare norme per l'edilizia approvazione dei piani Planungs- und Baurecht (Erschliessungshilfe) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 126
Building Permit Approval Standing Challenge
III 2022 66
Municipal Council Building Regulation Enforcement Appeal Inadmissibility
III 2022 104
Administrative Permit Rejection Appeal Inadmissibility
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2020 203
Challenge to Planning Decision Admissibility

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 161 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. B.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Alexander Frei, \n Färberstrasse 4, Postfach, 8832 Wollerau, \n |\n

\n\n

\n