Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 147 • VG SZ III 2017 147 Generato dall'IA

Petitioner v. School Board and Cantonal Government (Child Transfer)

Numero d'incarto III 2017 147
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner sought judicial review after the lower authorities, comprising a district school board and the cantonal government, decided against transferring their child from a specialized learning track to the regular school class. The court reasoned that the required prerequisites for such a transfer, specifically the demonstrated aptitude and readiness for the regular curriculum, were not sufficiently met based on the evaluations presented by the relevant educational institutions, thus upholding the prior decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Petitioner v. School Board and Cantonal Government (Child Transfer): The court reasoned that the required prerequisites for such a transfer, specifically the demonstrated aptitude and readiness for the regular curriculum, were not sufficiently met based on the evaluations presented by the relevant educational institutions, thus upholding the prior decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sindacato giurisdizionale bisogno di istruzione mutamento della residenza del minore assegnazione al circondario scolastico decisioni di riassegnazione o trasferimento legislazione scolastica Schulrecht (Übertritt in die Regelklasse) | Verschiedenes
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 88
School Board v. Government Council (Out-of-Canton Schooling)
III 2023 155
Municipal Council v. Cantonal Government on School Contribution Reduction
III 2018 222
Appeal Concerning Minor's Educational and Living Placement
III 2021 129
School Council Distance Learning Denial Upheld
III 2018 104
Scholarship Appeal Decision Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 147 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A+B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n gegen |\n

\n|\n \n \n1. Bezirksschulrat _____, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Schulrecht (Übertritt in die Regelklasse) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: