Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 146 • VG SZ III 2017 146 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Residential Building Parcelling and Exemption from Agricultural Law

Numero d'incarto III 2017 146
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two parties appealed a decision regarding the parcelling of a residential building and its release from the scope of the Agricultural Law (BGBB), including supplementary provisions. The lower authority had granted the application for parcelling and exemption under specific conditions. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, reasoning that the parceling and subsequent release of the residential property from the purview of the Agricultural Law were permissible because the property no longer served essential agricultural purposes and the requirements for such an exemption, including secondary stipulations, were met according to the relevant legal framework governing agricultural land use.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Land- und Forstwirtschaftsrecht (Abparzellierung Wohnhaus und Entlassung aus Geltungsbereich des BGBB mit Nebenbestimmungen) | Land- und Forstwirtschaftsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto agrario proprietà immobiliare destinazione ad uso abitativo legge sugli alloggi separazione dei beni condizioni d'uso specifiche
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 181
Appeal Against Denial of Agricultural Building Conversion to Residential Unit
III 2020 9
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Agricultural Holding Status and Leasehold Inclusion
III 2018 42
Appeal Against Revocation of Agricultural Building Permit Dismissed
III 2021 51
Appeal Against Building Permit on Agricultural Land
III 2019 88
Appeal Dismissed: Retroactive Permit for Unauthorized Subdivision of Agricultural Residence

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 146 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. November 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. Roger Brändli, \n Breitenstrasse 16, 8852 Altendorf, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Landund Forstwirtschaftsrecht (Abparzellierung Wohnhaus und \n Entlassung aus Geltungsbereich des BGBB mit Nebenbestimmungen) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: