Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 143 • VG SZ III 2017 143 Generato dall'IA

Corporation v. Zoning Board: Retroactive Application of Land Use Regulation

Numero d'incarto III 2017 143
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A corporation appealed a decision regarding the retroactive application of a zoning plan change that designated land previously zoned for commercial use as a protected area, which significantly reduced the land's development potential and value. The court reasoned that the administrative authority's decision to apply the new zoning regulation retroactively to the corporation's existing building permit application, which was submitted before the new plan's final approval but during its provisional period, was justified because the legal framework permitted such provisional application, and the goal of protecting the specific land area was sufficiently compelling to override the general expectation of the prior zoning being applied.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Corporation v. Zoning Board: Retroactive Application of Land Use Regulation: The court reasoned that the administrative authority's decision to apply the new zoning regulation retroactively to the corporation's existing building permit application, which was submitted before the new plan's final approval but during its provisional period, was justified because the legal framework permitted such provisional application, and the goal of protecting the specific land area was sufficiently compelling to override the general expectation of the prior zoning being applied.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
utilizzazione del fondo licenza edilizia a posteriori piano di utilizzazione domanda indirizzata all'autorità norme per l'edilizia cambiamento di destinazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Imposed the court costs on the appellant because their appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 205
Corporation Zoning Boundary Adjustment Appeal
III 2021 107
Company v. Municipal Council (Building Permit Zoning Dispute)
III 2021 39
Appeal Regarding Zoning and Building Law Decision
III 2018 181
Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
III 2021 118
Corporation v. Municipal Council (Zoning Permit Denial)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed the court costs on the appellant because their appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 143 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Y.________und \n Rechtsanwältin MLaw Z.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinde Wollerau, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n