Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2017 141 • VG SZ III 2017 141 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Appeals Regarding Public Participation and Planning Procedures

Numero d'incarto III 2017 141
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns appeals against a decision by the cantonal government upholding a municipal decision concerning building permits, where the appellants contested the scope of public participation and the planning process related to construction in their area. The court ruled that the administrative procedures followed by the lower authorities complied with the applicable planning and procedural laws, specifically addressing the appellants' concerns regarding the scope of public notification and the correct application of planning instruments, thereby dismissing the appeals.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Permit Appeals Regarding Public Participation and Planning Procedures: The court ruled that the administrative procedures followed by the lower authorities complied with the applicable planning and procedural laws, specifically addressing the appellants' concerns regarding the scope of public notification and the correct application of planning instruments, thereby dismissing the appeals.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale edificio pubblico domanda indirizzata all'autorità approvazione dei piani legittimazione a contestare licenza notificazione della decisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the losing party to pay the court fees for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 141 |\n |\n \n|\n III 2017 142 |\n |\n \n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2017 141), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. Roger Brändli, \n Breitenstrasse 16, 8852 Altendorf, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2017 142), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Heribert Trachsel, \n Seestrasse 69, 8855 Wangen, \n substituiert durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Karin Aggeler, ebenda, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wangen, Postfach 264, 8855 Wangen, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2017 141 + 142), \n4. C.________, \n Beschwerdegegner (Verfahren III 2017 141 + 142), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt M.A. HSG Andreas Jörger, \n Färberstrasse 4, Postfach 423, 8832 Wollerau, \n |\n

\n\n

\n