Building Permit Appeals Regarding Public Participation and Planning Procedures
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns appeals against a decision by the cantonal government upholding a municipal decision concerning building permits, where the appellants contested the scope of public participation and the planning process related to construction in their area. The court ruled that the administrative procedures followed by the lower authorities complied with the applicable planning and procedural laws, specifically addressing the appellants' concerns regarding the scope of public notification and the correct application of planning instruments, thereby dismissing the appeals.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Permit Appeals Regarding Public Participation and Planning Procedures: The court ruled that the administrative procedures followed by the lower authorities complied with the applicable planning and procedural laws, specifically addressing the appellants' concerns regarding the scope of public notification and the correct application of planning instruments, thereby dismissing the appeals.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court ordered the losing party to pay the court fees for the appeal.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 141 |\n |\n \n|\n III 2017 142 |\n |\n \n|\n |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2017 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2017 141), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. Roger Brändli, \n Breitenstrasse 16, 8852 Altendorf, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2017 142), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Heribert Trachsel, \n Seestrasse 69, 8855 Wangen, \n substituiert durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Karin Aggeler, ebenda, \n |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wangen, Postfach 264, 8855 Wangen, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2017 141 + 142), \n4. C.________, \n Beschwerdegegner (Verfahren III 2017 141 + 142), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt M.A. HSG Andreas Jörger, \n Färberstrasse 4, Postfach 423, 8832 Wollerau, \n |\n
\n\n
\n