Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2017 126 • VG SZ III 2017 126 Generato dall'IA

Property Owner Standing in Building Permit Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2017 126
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner appealed a decision regarding the approval of a development project by the municipal council, which was subsequently upheld by higher cantonal authorities, concerning the granting of a building permit for a neighboring property. The court reasoned that the appellant lacked standing to challenge the decision because the appealed administrative acts did not directly affect the appellant's legally protected interests, as the relevant building regulations and zoning ordinances were correctly applied, and the potential impact on the appellant's property rights, such as sunlight or views, did not meet the threshold requiring intervention.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Property Owner Standing in Building Permit Appeal: The court reasoned that the appellant lacked standing to challenge the decision because the appealed administrative acts did not directly affect the appellant's legally protected interests, as the relevant building regulations and zoning ordinances were correctly applied, and the potential impact on the appellant's property rights, such as sunlight or views, did not meet the threshold requiring intervention.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
legittimazione a contestare licenza licenza edilizia comunale proprietà immobiliare legittimazione a ricorrere prescrizioni di zona interesse giuridicamente protetto Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2016 191
Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 160
Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2023 21
Building Permit Standing Appeal Dismissed Due to Affected Interest
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 126 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, 8855 Wangen, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Alexander Frei, \n Färberstrasse 4, Postfach, 8832 Wollerau, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wangen, Postfach 264, 8855 Wangen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Hans Rudolf Ziegler, \n Felsenstrasse 4, Postfach 3, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. C.________ AG, 8853 Lachen, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Heribert Trachsel, \n Seestrasse 69, 8855 Wangen, \n5. D.________, 8855 Wangen, \n Beigeladener, \n |\n

\n\n

\n