Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2016 96 • VG SZ III 2016 96 Generato dall'IA

Construction Project Zoning Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2016 96
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal challenged a cantonal government decision that upheld a municipal council's approval of a construction project, specifically relating to the necessary adjustments of land use and zoning plans to accommodate the development. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the administrative decisions regarding the required plan adjustments lacked a sufficient factual or legal basis, finding that the cantonal authorities had acted within their discretionary powers and complied with relevant spatial planning regulations in approving the necessary changes for the construction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 64 BGG; Construction Project Zoning Appeal Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the administrative decisions regarding the required plan adjustments lacked a sufficient factual or legal basis, finding that the cantonal authorities had acted within their discretionary powers and complied with relevant spatial planning regulations in approving the necessary changes for the construction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
potere d'apprezzamento comunale approvazione dei piani prescrizioni di zona terreno comunale legittimazione a contestare licenza autorità amministrativa Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung Gartenhaus) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to regulate the allocation of judicial costs for the unsuccessful appeal.
Art. 64 BGG
The provision was cited regarding the granting of legal aid for the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2018 127
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 170
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to regulate the allocation of judicial costs for the unsuccessful appeal.

Art. 64 BGG

The provision was cited regarding the granting of legal aid for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Galgenen, Büelstrasse 15, Postfach 141, 8854 Siebnen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n