Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2016 7 • VG SZ III 2016 7 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Custody

Numero d'incarto III 2016 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision that modified custody arrangements, which was upheld by a subsequent authority. The appellant challenged the lower court's decision regarding the change in custody, which favored the other parent. The court reasoned that the modification of custody was justified because the previous arrangement was no longer in the best interest of the child, evidenced by a review of the current circumstances and expert evaluations, thereby upholding the decisions of the prior instances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Custody: The appellant challenged the lower court's decision regarding the change in custody, which favored the other parent. The court reasoned that the modification of custody was justified because the previous arrangement was no longer in the best interest of the child, evidenced by a review of the current circumstances and expert evaluations, thereby upholding the decisions of the prior instances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
modifica dell'autorità parentale interesse del figlio mutamento di giurisprudenza decisione motivata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio contestazione della presunzione di paternità Sozialhilfe | java.util.HashMap/1797211028

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it concerned a non-final decision regarding the appointment of a guardian.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Used to impose court costs on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 40
Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed Based on Child's Best Interests
ZK1 2022 10
Custody Modification Due to Severe Parental Conflict
III 2019 142
Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld
ZK2 2024 78
Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Support and Visitation
ZK1 2016 45
Appeal Regarding Modification of Divorce Decree Visitation and Child Support

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. b BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it concerned a non-final decision regarding the appointment of a guardian.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Used to impose court costs on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 7 III 2016 21 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. April 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n M.A. HSG Sandra Gehrig, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, c/o B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur., |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. D.________, \n Vorinstanz I, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n C.________ 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz II, \n3. B.________, \n Beigeladene (I), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw E.________, \n4. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) … \n Beigeladene (II), \n |\n

\n\n

\n