Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2016 188 • VG SZ III 2016 188 Generato dall'IA

Contractual Dispute Appeal Dismissal

Numero d'incarto III 2016 188
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a prior decision concerning a contractual dispute where one party sought damages related to an agreement. The court reasoned that for the appeal to succeed, the appellant had to demonstrate that the lower court's findings of fact were demonstrably incorrect or that the application of the law was flawed; however, as the appellant failed to sufficiently contest the material facts established by the lower authority or show a clear error in the legal assessment applied to those facts, the appeal was ultimately dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Contractual Dispute Appeal Dismissal: The court reasoned that for the appeal to succeed, the appellant had to demonstrate that the lower court's findings of fact were demonstrably incorrect or that the application of the law was flawed; however, as the appellant failed to sufficiently contest the material facts established by the lower authority or show a clear error in the legal assessment applied to those facts, the appeal was ultimately dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
risarcimento contrattuale del danno oggetto della lite licenziamento abusivo errore di fatto errore manifesto decisione incidentale impugnabile
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2022 44
Contractual Liability Appeal Dismissal
ZK1 2016 8
Appeal of Contractual Debt Dispute Dismissed
I 2024 59
Contractual Dispute Appeal Against Corporation Ruling
II 2020 111
Contract Dispute Affirmation Appeal
ZK1 2020 30
Vehicle Purchase Contract Dispute Appeal Dismissal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 188 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. Mai 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n H.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Peter Krebs, \n Täfernhof, Mellingerstrasse 207, 5405 Baden-Dättwil, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. B.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Christian Michel, \n Breitenstrasse 16, 8852 Altendorf, |\n

\n\n

\n