Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2016 152 • VG SZ III 2016 152 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Planning Standards Upheld in Refusal of Building Height Increase

Numero d'incarto III 2016 152
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought authorization for the construction of an additional storey on an existing residential building, which was initially approved but later partially denied by the cantonal authority regarding the building's height and floor area ratio, leading to the rejection of the final building permit application. The court reasoned that the cantonal planning standards were intended to preserve the surrounding neighborhood's character, and the proposed addition, exceeding established height limitations and negatively impacting the visual relationship with adjacent properties by increasing the building's mass, was deemed incompatible with the existing zoning regulations, thus upholding the rejection of the building permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Planning Standards Upheld in Refusal of Building Height Increase: The court reasoned that the cantonal planning standards were intended to preserve the surrounding neighborhood's character, and the proposed addition, exceeding established height limitations and negatively impacting the visual relationship with adjacent properties by increasing the building's mass, was deemed incompatible with the existing zoning regulations, thus upholding the rejection of the building permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
altezza massima dell'edificio proprietà immobiliare legittimazione a contestare licenza piano di allineamento licenza edilizia comunale approvazione dei piani
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 151 III 2016 152 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. April 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Hans Rudolf Ziegler, \n Felsenstrasse 4, Postfach 3, 8808 Pfäffikon, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung: Gebäudehöhe, \n Ausnützungsziffer etc.) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: