Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2016 134 • VG SZ III 2016 134 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2016 134
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant challenged a decision by an administrative body concerning the denial of a building permit for an agricultural building, arguing that the local authority failed to consider the necessary justification for the structure on the agricultural property and improperly applied zoning regulations regarding building size and location. The court ruled against the appellant, reasoning that the administrative decision was lawful because the appellant did not adequately demonstrate the necessity or functional requirement of the proposed structure on the agricultural land, and the local planning regulations concerning the building envelope and site placement were correctly applied by the lower instance, thus upholding the denial of the permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld: The court ruled against the appellant, reasoning that the administrative decision was lawful because the appellant did not adequately demonstrate the necessity or functional requirement of the proposed structure on the agricultural land, and the local planning regulations concerning the building envelope and site placement were correctly applied by the lower instance, thus upholding the denial of the permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondo agricolo obbligo del permesso di costruzione prescrizioni di zona ubicazione dell'immobile autorità amministrativa protrazione dell'affitto Wirtschaftliche Hilfe (Zahnbehandlungskosten) | Sozialhilfe
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 134 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Oktober 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Natascha Ofner, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, …, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. B.________, , \n Vorinstanz \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n