Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2014 183 • VG SZ III 2014 183 Generato dall'IA

Property Owner Appeal of Construction Project Approval Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2014 183
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner appealed a decision concerning the approval of a construction project, where the project required modifications to existing regulations and had received prior administrative approvals despite objections regarding local planning law conformity and neighbor rights. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies correctly interpreted the relevant planning law provisions regarding the project's scope and impact, finding that the modifications were permissible and the appellant had not demonstrated that their proprietary rights were infringed beyond acceptable legal limits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Property Owner Appeal of Construction Project Approval Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies correctly interpreted the relevant planning law provisions regarding the project's scope and impact, finding that the modifications were permissible and the appellant had not demonstrated that their proprietary rights were infringed beyond acceptable legal limits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
approvazione dei piani legittimazione a contestare licenza diritto di proprietà proprietà immobiliare costruzione abusiva distrazione di valori patrimoniali Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 52
Property Owner's Late Appeal Against Completed Construction Design Dismissed
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2018 160
Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2017 126
Property Owner Standing in Building Permit Appeal
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2014 183 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Mai 2015 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Dr. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________,________ |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n Ziffer 4 bis 8 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. I.________, \n I.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n