Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2014 11 • VG SZ III 2014 11 Generato dall'IA

Property Owners Challenge Municipal Speed Bump Installation

Numero d'incarto III 2014 11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of property owners challenged a municipal decision that approved the installation of a new traffic calming measure, specifically speed bumps, on a public road passing through their properties, arguing that the measure violated their rights to property and a reasonable building permit process due to alleged procedural flaws and a lack of proper necessity. The court upheld the lower instances' decisions, reasoning that the administrative body had a proper legal basis for implementing traffic calming measures to ensure road safety, the measure was proportionate to the safety concerns, and the planning and decision-making process, including consultation, met the required procedural standards, thus rejecting the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Owners Challenge Municipal Speed Bump Installation: The court upheld the lower instances' decisions, reasoning that the administrative body had a proper legal basis for implementing traffic calming measures to ensure road safety, the measure was proportionate to the safety concerns, and the planning and decision-making process, including consultation, met the required procedural standards, thus rejecting the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sicurezza della circolazione licenza edilizia comunale proprietà immobiliare diritto di proprietà misura pianificatoria impugnazione di decisioni amministrative Planungs- und Baurecht (nachträgliche Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to allocate the judicial costs for the federal administrative court proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 32
Owners v. Municipal Council (Rezoning Initiative Admissibility)
III 2018 99
Property Owners v. Municipal Council (Construction Permit Challenge)
III 2025 131
Owner v. Municipality on Building Permit Denial
III 2023 196
Property Owners' Access Rights Over Private Road Upheld
III 2019 54
Property Owner v. Municipality on Road Improvement Levy Proportionality

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to allocate the judicial costs for the federal administrative court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2014 11 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2014 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ \n2. B.________ \n3. C.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. H., |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________ \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n