Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2013 5 • VG SZ III 2013 5 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Refusal of Residence Permit Extension

Numero d'incarto III 2013 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a challenge against a decision by local and cantonal authorities concerning the right to reside, where the petitioner was appealing a decision that had effectively rejected her continued stay. The court reasoned that although the petitioner had resided in the country for a significant period, the legal basis for the extension of her residence permit had not been met under the relevant law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal because the prerequisites for maintaining the right to reside were absent.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a BGG, Art. 66 al. 1 BGG; Challenge to Refusal of Residence Permit Extension: The court reasoned that although the petitioner had resided in the country for a significant period, the legal basis for the extension of her residence permit had not been met under the relevant law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal because the prerequisites for maintaining the right to reside were absent.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di soggiorno permesso di dimora scaduto legittimazione a contestare licenza revoca del permesso di domicilio estensione del diritto di visita ricorso per carenza Ausländerrecht (Kantonswechsel) | Ausländerrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a BGG
The appeal is declared inadmissible because it concerns a non-final decision according to this article.
Art. 66 al. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 194
Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Residence Permit Based on Insufficient Integration
III 2023 82
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit and Expulsion Order
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2022 68
Cantonal Government Refusal to Rule on Hardship Residence Permit
III 2022 80
Residence Determination Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a BGG

The appeal is declared inadmissible because it concerns a non-final decision according to this article.

Art. 66 al. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2013 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2013 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. Gemeinde L.________, handelnd durch die Fürsorgebehörde L.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n |\n

\n\n

\n