Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2010 99 • VG SZ III 2010 99 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Validity and Zoning Regulations

Numero d'incarto III 2010 99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal regarding building permits where the appellants challenged the lower courts' decisions related to zoning and construction law. The court reasoned that the appellants' objections regarding the scope of necessary neighbor consultation and the validity of prior administrative decisions were unfounded because the lower authorities had correctly applied the relevant planning and construction regulations, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Validity and Zoning Regulations: The court reasoned that the appellants' objections regarding the scope of necessary neighbor consultation and the validity of prior administrative decisions were unfounded because the lower authorities had correctly applied the relevant planning and construction regulations, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità della licenza edilizia prescrizioni di zona norme per l'edilizia superamento dell'altezza massima deroga alla licenza edilizia autorità amministrativa Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2024 179
Building Permit Appeals Litigation
III 2018 74
Appeal Concerning Construction Permit Legality
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2021 39
Appeal Regarding Zoning and Building Law Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2010 99 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. September 2010 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.rer.pol. Marcel Birchler und Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Sarah Duss, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________, \n2. D.________, \n3. E.________, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. F.________, \n2. G.________, \n - H.________, - I.________, - J.________, Beschwerdegegnerinnen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: