Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2010 115 • VG SZ III 2010 115 Generato dall'IA

Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions

Numero d'incarto III 2010 115
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves multiple parties appealing decisions from a district council and a cantonal government council concerning a matter of administrative law. The court reviewed the administrative decisions and the basis for the appeal, ultimately reaching a verdict based on its interpretation of the relevant legal framework governing the dispute between the appellants and the administrative bodies, though the specific subject matter and precise legal reasoning for the final decision are not detailed beyond the procedural context of the appeal against the lower administrative rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions: The court reviewed the administrative decisions and the basis for the appeal, ultimately reaching a verdict based on its interpretation of the relevant legal framework governing the dispute between the appellants and the administrative bodies, though the specific subject matter and precise legal reasoning for the final decision are not detailed beyond the procedural context of the appeal against the lower administrative rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
oggetto della lite decisione quadro impugnazione di decisioni amministrative controllo della procedura interpretazione del diritto e-government Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to regulate the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2022 24
Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2024 44
Appeal Against Municipal Council Administrative Decision
III 2017 110
Appeal Against District Council Administrative Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to regulate the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2010 115 III 2010 118 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. November 2010 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.rer.pol. Marcel Birchler und Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Sarah Duss, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, (Verfahren III 2010 115) \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, Ziff. 2 bis 4 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, (Verfahren III 2010 118) |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Rathaus 1, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. F.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. G.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n