Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2025 9 • VG SZ II 2025 9 Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefits Denial Due to Unjustified Asset Transfer

Numero d'incarto II 2025 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant for supplementary benefits was denied coverage because the responsible compensation fund determined that the claimant transferred assets to a third party shortly before applying, leading to an assumption of asset relinquishment without proper justification. The court, reviewing the decision regarding supplementary benefits based on asset relinquishment, upheld the rejection, reasoning that the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer of assets was necessary and not made with the intention of circumventing the rules for receiving benefits, and in this case, the applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the disposition of the assets.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Supplementary Benefits Denial Due to Unjustified Asset Transfer: The court, reviewing the decision regarding supplementary benefits based on asset relinquishment, upheld the rejection, reasoning that the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer of assets was necessary and not made with the intention of circumventing the rules for receiving benefits, and in this case, the applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the disposition of the assets.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Juli 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: