Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2025 61 • VG SZ II 2025 61 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefit Entitlement Following Voluntary Job Cessation

Numero d'incarto II 2025 61
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant appealed a decision regarding entitlement to unemployment benefits, stemming from a situation where the appellant ceased employment. The court reasoned that the appellant's termination of employment was due to personal circumstances that did not justify an immediate entitlement to benefits, as the appellant had not fulfilled the necessary conditions or provided sufficient justification under the relevant unemployment insurance law to avoid sanctions for voluntary job loss.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefit Entitlement Following Voluntary Job Cessation: The court reasoned that the appellant's termination of employment was due to personal circumstances that did not justify an immediate entitlement to benefits, as the appellant had not fulfilled the necessary conditions or provided sufficient justification under the relevant unemployment insurance law to avoid sanctions for voluntary job loss.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità di disoccupazione diritto alle prestazioni assicurative cessazione delle prestazioni condizioni di impiego circostanze personali assicurazione facoltativa
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 79
Unemployment Benefit Entitlement During Post-Termination Salary Continuation
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2023 66
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 61 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. November 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Unia Arbeitslosenkasse, Kompetenzzentrum D-CH West, Monbijoustrasse 61, Postfach 3398, 3001 Bern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosen­entschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: