Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2025 47 • VG SZ II 2025 47 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Numero d'incarto II 2025 47
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the employment office that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits. The court reasoned that the relevant insurance provisions required an applicant to actively seek suitable employment that matches their qualifications and previous earnings, and since the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating adequate job search efforts conforming to the prescribed standards and timelines, the administrative decision to suspend benefits was upheld.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG; Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal: The court reasoned that the relevant insurance provisions required an applicant to actively seek suitable employment that matches their qualifications and previous earnings, and since the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating adequate job search efforts conforming to the prescribed standards and timelines, the administrative decision to suspend benefits was upheld.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione delle indennità di disoccupazione diritto alle prestazioni occupazione adeguata disoccupazione organo dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione nuova domanda di prestazioni d'invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG
The appeal is dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs.
Generato dall'IA
II 2023 77
Claimant v. Labor Office (Unemployment Benefits Suspension Duration)
II 2022 70
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Insufficient Job Search
II 2021 8
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2021 7
Claimant v. Unemployment Benefits Board

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG

The appeal is dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 47 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. September 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung,