Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2025 38 • VG SZ II 2025 38 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer

Numero d'incarto II 2025 38
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Office for Labor to suspend entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the appellant's refusal of a suitable job offer. The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione delle indennità di disoccupazione occupazione adeguata disoccupazione diritto alle prestazioni divieto di lavoro job sharing

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2023 93
Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2020 97
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refused Job Offer Upheld, Period Reduced

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 38 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Pascal Pfeifhofer, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchs­berechtigung wegen Ablehnung einer zumutbaren Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: