Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2024 83 • VG SZ II 2024 83 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Claimant (Supplementary Benefits Denial for Asset Divestment)

Numero d'incarto II 2024 83
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal equalization office denying supplementary benefits due to the claimant's failure to divest of assets. The central issue was whether the claimant, who received substantial gifts shortly before applying for benefits, had intentionally rendered themselves indigent to qualify for the aid. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the voluntary divestment of assets shortly before applying for supplementary benefits, without a valid, impending necessity to make such gifts, constitutes an impermissible circumvention of asset requirements for receiving public assistance, thereby justifying the denial of benefits for the period covered by the divested assets.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Claimant (Supplementary Benefits Denial for Asset Divestment): The central issue was whether the claimant, who received substantial gifts shortly before applying for benefits, had intentionally rendered themselves indigent to qualify for the aid. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the voluntary divestment of assets shortly before applying for supplementary benefits, without a valid, impending necessity to make such gifts, constitutes an impermissible circumvention of asset requirements for receiving public assistance, thereby justifying the denial of benefits for the period covered by the divested assets.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sostanza determinante prestazioni complementari revoca di prestazioni sociali suddivisione della previdenza professionale spossessamento conseguente al fallimento omissione di soccorso Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 51
Cantonal Compensation Office Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2019 30
Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal
II 2020 84
Appeal Regarding Imputed Asset Waiver Denial for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 58
Appeal Against Denial of Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputation of Waived Loan as Existing Asset
II 2024 112
Claimant Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputed Wealth from Unexplained Asset Decreases

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Dezember 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Andrea Reutter, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: