Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2024 75 • VG SZ II 2024 75 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance in Health Insurance Review

Numero d'incarto II 2024 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought judicial review of a decision concerning health insurance, specifically challenging the lower court's refusal to entertain the matter. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to meet the procedural requirements for filing, specifically regarding the timely payment of required fees or the provision of sufficient security, thereby justifying the lower court's non-entry into the substance of the claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance in Health Insurance Review: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to meet the procedural requirements for filing, specifically regarding the timely payment of required fees or the provision of sufficient security, thereby justifying the lower court's non-entry into the substance of the claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
controllo della procedura insinuazione del credito assicurazione malattia indicazioni sulla salute riserva d'assicurazione autorizzazione di praticare a carico dell'assicurazione malattia Krankenversicherung (Nichteintreten) | Krankenversicherung (ohne med. SV)
Generato dall'IA
ZK1 2021 20
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK2 2018 20
Defendant's Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK1 2022 42
Dismissal of Appeal for Procedural Non-Compliance and Insufficient Substantiation
BEK 2020 115
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK2 2023 15
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance Regarding Spousal Support Modification

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. November 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Fiona Schuler, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Nichteintreten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: