Stepparent Child Benefit Entitlement Dispute
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appellant sought the reimbursement of child benefits previously paid and requested supplementary child benefits for a stepdaughter, which an equalization fund denied, leading to an appeal. The court addressed whether the appellant, as a stepparent, was entitled to these benefits for a child residing with them, reasoning that entitlement to supplementary child benefits for stepchildren under social security law depends strictly on meeting the legal criteria regarding dependency and the legal relationship, which in this case were not sufficiently established to warrant the requested payments or reimbursement of previously paid benefits.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAStepparent Child Benefit Entitlement Dispute: The court addressed whether the appellant, as a stepparent, was entitled to these benefits for a child residing with them, reasoning that entitlement to supplementary child benefits for stepchildren under social security law depends strictly on meeting the legal criteria regarding dependency and the legal relationship, which in this case were not sufficiently established to warrant the requested payments or reimbursement of previously paid benefits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 22 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n AHV / IV (Rückforderung Kinderrente / Ersuchen um Kinderzusatzrente für Stieftochter) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: