Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn applicant appealed a decision by the unemployment insurance office, which denied the extension of unemployment benefits because the applicant failed to accept a suitable job offer meeting the criteria of the relevant law. The court reasoned that the offered employment was objectively suitable, as it corresponded to the applicant's qualifications, had similar working conditions, and offered a comparable salary to the previous employment, thereby upholding the denial of benefit extension because the statutory conditions for refusal due to non-acceptance of a suitable job were met.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAUnemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court reasoned that the offered employment was objectively suitable, as it corresponded to the applicant's qualifications, had similar working conditions, and offered a comparable salary to the previous employment, thereby upholding the denial of benefit extension because the statutory conditions for refusal due to non-acceptance of a suitable job were met.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 93 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Jan Bucher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n