Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2023 89 • VG SZ II 2023 89 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Dispute

Numero d'incarto II 2023 89
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a decision by the unemployment insurance fund regarding the calculation of their insured earnings, specifically disputing the inclusion of certain variable components in the base salary used for calculating daily allowances following a period of unemployment benefit receipt. The court reasoned that the relevant legislation concerning the calculation of the reference earnings for daily allowances mandates the inclusion of regular variable payments, such as those tied to company performance or profit sharing, provided they are contractual obligations and not purely discretionary bonuses, thereby upholding the fund's assessment based on the consistent payment history of these components during the relevant period.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant legislation concerning the calculation of the reference earnings for daily allowances mandates the inclusion of regular variable payments, such as those tied to company performance or profit sharing, provided they are contractual obligations and not purely discretionary bonuses, thereby upholding the fund's assessment based on the consistent payment history of these components during the relevant period.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
calcolo dell'indennità di disoccupazione guadagno assicurato obblighi contrattuali interessenza dei lavoratori calcolo del reddito da valido salario determinante
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 89 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n