Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2023 83 • VG SZ II 2023 83 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position

Numero d'incarto II 2023 83
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought unemployment insurance benefits after terminating their activity, claiming unemployment, but the insurer denied the claim because the appellant was deemed to hold an employer-like position ("arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung") and thus was not considered an insured unemployed person. The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position: The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione disoccupazione azienda assicurata cessazione d'impiego posizione dominante persone esercitanti un'attività lucrativa
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Dezember 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosenent-schädigung; arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: