Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2023 66 • VG SZ II 2023 66 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation

Numero d'incarto II 2023 66
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a decision by the Office of Labor that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits following a voluntary resignation from their prior employment without a valid reason. The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation: The court reasoned that the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate an urgent personal reason necessitating the immediate termination of the employment relationship, as required under the relevant insurance regulations for avoiding sanctions following voluntary job loss, and therefore upheld the administrative decision to suspend benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione delle indennità di disoccupazione dimissioni volontarie rapporto di lavoro diritto alle prestazioni disoccupazione diritto alla disconnessione
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 66 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung;