Unemployment Insurance Benefits Appeal: Active Job Search Requirement
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA claimant appealed a decision by an employment office that had denied the continuation of unemployment insurance benefits following the expiration of the initial entitlement period, arguing that the claimant had actively sought employment and that the denial was disproportionate given the claimant's age and lack of recent long-term employment. The court upheld the employment office's decision, reasoning that the claimant failed to meet the continuous requirement to actively seek suitable employment as defined by the relevant statutes, specifically noting insufficient evidence of job search intensity and that the claimant's age and employment history, while relevant for job placement assistance, did not automatically exempt them from the general obligation to seek work diligently to maintain insurance eligibility.
Regesto Legislator
UfficialeArbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung infolge fehlenden Nachweises persönlicher Arbeitsbemühungen) | Arbeitslosenversicherung
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 6 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, \n 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n