Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2023 39 • VG SZ II 2023 39 Generato dall'IA

Social Security Benefits Calculation Based on Presumed Spousal Income

Numero d'incarto II 2023 39
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision by the social security fund concerning supplementary benefits, specifically challenging the imputation of hypothetical spousal income into the calculation. The court reasoned that the relevant social security law permits the calculation of benefits based on a presumed income for a non-working spouse if they could reasonably be expected to work, thereby upholding the decision to account for the hypothetical income.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Social Security Benefits Calculation Based on Presumed Spousal Income: The court reasoned that the relevant social security law permits the calculation of benefits based on a presumed income for a non-working spouse if they could reasonably be expected to work, thereby upholding the decision to account for the hypothetical income.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni della sicurezza sociale calcolo del reddito coniuge reddito ipotetico del coniuge rendita d'invalidità per coniugi calcolo delle prestazioni complementari
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 50
Social Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income
II 2018 33
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Hypothetical Income Imputation for Non-Working Spouse
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2021 88
Spousal Income Imputation in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2020 54
Social Insurance Fund Recalculation of Supplementary Benefits Based on Hypothetical Income and Exclusion of Apprentice Salary

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 39 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung eines hypothetischen \n Einkommens der Ehefrau) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: