Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2023 18 • VG SZ II 2023 18 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment

Numero d'incarto II 2023 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a decision that suspended their entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the refusal to accept a job assignment. The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Job Assignment: The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly assessed the suitability of the offered employment and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the assignment was unreasonable or that their refusal was justified under the relevant provisions of the unemployment insurance law, thereby upholding the suspension of benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione delle indennità di disoccupazione diritto alle prestazioni disoccupazione offerta di lavoro violazione di obbligazioni contrattuali di lavoro divieto di cessione
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2025 5
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Assigned Job
II 2023 15
Unemployment Benefit Sanction Upheld for Refusal of Assigned Job
II 2021 59
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Non-Compliance with Job Application Instruction

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung wegen Nichtannahme einer zugewiesenen Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: