Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 88 • VG SZ II 2022 88 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Deadline Reinstatement for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Benefits Denied

Numero d'incarto II 2022 88
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought reinstatement of the deadline to appeal a decision concerning unemployment insurance benefits, specifically regarding short-time work compensation related to the COVID-19 pandemic, after missing the original appeal period. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the reason for missing the deadline was without their fault, as they did not provide sufficient justification for their failure to adhere to the statutory time limit, thus upholding the lower instance's refusal to reinstate the deadline.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Deadline Reinstatement for COVID-19 Short-Time Work Benefits Denied: The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the reason for missing the deadline was without their fault, as they did not provide sufficient justification for their failure to adhere to the statutory time limit, thus upholding the lower instance's refusal to reinstate the deadline.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ripristino delle indennità disoccupazione inosservanza del termine indennità per lavoro ridotto prestazione statutaria disoccupazione termini di ricorso
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 61
Company Appeal Regarding COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation Denial
II 2021 112
Corporation Appeal of Denied COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation
II 2021 47
Company Appeal Regarding Denial of COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation Due to Insufficient Documentation
II 2021 15
Company Appeal on Denied COVID-19 Short-Time Work Compensation
II 2021 3
COVID-19 Unemployment Benefits Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 88 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Februar 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Covid-19; Kurzarbeitsentschädigung; Fristwiederherstellung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: