Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2022 87 • VG SZ II 2022 87 Generato dall'IA

Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Property Transfer for Supplementary Benefits)

Numero d'incarto II 2022 87
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioner, who was receiving supplementary benefits, was required to transfer ownership of a property to the compensation fund as a condition for receiving those benefits, despite having previously argued that the transfer was unjustified due to an alleged agreement to keep the asset. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the petitioner was aware of the legal obligation to transfer the asset upon receiving supplementary benefits, and the purported agreement did not override this statutory requirement, thus affirming the decision to mandate the property transfer as part of the benefit conditions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Petitioner v. Compensation Fund (Property Transfer for Supplementary Benefits): The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the petitioner was aware of the legal obligation to transfer the asset upon receiving supplementary benefits, and the purported agreement did not override this statutory requirement, thus affirming the decision to mandate the property transfer as part of the benefit conditions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trasferimento della proprietà prestazioni complementari fondo di compensazione requisito legale condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa convenzione di libero passaggio Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2019 75
Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2022 87 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: